End Anti-Child Budgets

No grandparent would choose a system that leaves their grandchildren worse off. No government should either.

Across Canada, budgets from Liberal, Conservative, and NDP governments are anti-child, anti-parent, and anti-young worker. How do we know? We follow the money.

Governments invest far more urgently in supporting older Canadians than in what younger generations need to build a good life. The result is stark: young Canadians’ wellbeing is declining — as fast as in countries like Lebanon and Afghanistan. When young adults struggle, their children are also more likely to fall behind. 

This isn't accidental. It's a pattern that flows from our policy choices, including the longstanding failure of governments to prepare for population aging - and the predictable costs that accompany it. But we can make different choices. 

Join us in calling for an end to ageism in government budgets.

Yes, I want governments to end ageist budgets so that every generation can thrive.

*By clicking "Add your signature", you consent to receive periodic updates from Generation Squeeze by email, text and/or phone. You can unsubscribe or text STOP at any time. Message and data rates may apply. Read our privacy policy.

3 ways governments sustain anti-child budgets

1. Cut back on what younger generations need

As costs rise and revenues don’t keep up, governments scale back investments elsewhere. The result: less support for housing, child care, education, and good jobs — leaving younger people with higher rents, more debt, and fewer opportunities.

 

2. Ask younger people to pay more   

Even as younger Canadians face rising costs for housing, education, and raising families, they are paying 20-40% more in taxes to support an aging population compared to what today’s seniors paid during their working years.

 

3. Run up big deficits

Governments led by every major party — Liberal, Conservative, and NDP — are running large deficits to deal with rising costs for seniors’ medical care and Old Age Security. These unpaid bills are passed on to younger generations.

 

 

The cost of ageist budgets for younger Canadians

Young people are increasingly miserable

Canadian research shows average life satisfaction among those under 30 is dropping. The sharpness of the decline puts Canada alongside places like Lebanon and Afghanistan.

Earnings are down. Insecurity is up.

Hard work doesn’t pay off the way it used to. Young people today earn less than they did in the 1970s, when today's seniors were young. That's a big reason...

Homes are out of reach

By comparison with today's seniors, young people now often must work 10 to 20 years longer to save a 20% down payment on an average home. When dreams of home...

Act Now to End Anti-Child Budgets

Commit to calling out ageist budgets

Join other organizations calling out ageist budgets. Naming ageism helps connect issues like child care, housing, and education to the bigger picture — and builds momentum to shift priorities.